![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
| Notes from Drums for Peace-Meeting | |||||||
Sunday
23.11.2008 |
|||||||
All
implemented projects have been very succesfull, |
|||||||
| 1. | GLOBAL
SOUNDS exchange in youth-centre Cassiopeia was an experiment on making
a specific music-exchange.
The 4 workshops was: percussion, stomp,
human beat-box and ”how to be on stage” and the was made
on rotation basis. Besides this was offered band playing for everybody on 3 different levels according to the many informations on instrument, band experience, yers playing an instrument etc. Collected before the exchange. and also additional workshops on percussion, stomp and humna-beat-box was made for those who wanted so. A public presentation / concert was made with the different band groups as well as the workshops. |
||||||
|
2.
|
BRIDGES
exchange in DK got approved 2.000 € for paying a free-lance-journalist
produce articles on the exchange and the DfP-methodology and to secure
that they
were printed in relevant newsletters. They were brought 3 times in pedagogical
union newsletters and probably seen by 30.000 Danish professionals. |
||||||
|
3.
|
TERE
exchange in Estonia resulted in this discussion on "Youthpass", which
is the ”Youth
in Action” recommended certificate It is not necessary with a general common DfP-praxis on youtpass, and a
further discussion will be made next year, when more people and organisations
have experiences on the production of this. |
||||||
| 4. | RHYTHM seminar was
focussing on the influence of rhythm on our mind and body and combined
the practical hands on drumming with inputs from music-therapy, psychology
a.o. All participants had to reflect and describe own experiences. The seminar was also part of the DfP -documentation strategy. |
||||||
|
5.
|
ACTING AROUND exchange
in Wales resulted in a discussion on the the public presentation part of
a DfP-exchange: - DfP-guidelines tells: ”Drums for Peace workshops are mainly based on the following model: The workshops are brought together and shown to an audience. This can be an invited audience such as a school, or the public.” - ”Process or Product” is not the issue for this discussion. The presentation is an important part of the process and especially when working with disadvantaged people. o The presentation brings the full group together o Rotation and no presentation is unknown methodology and difficulkt to explain to potential participants, who expect the usual DfP-concept. |
||||||
| 6. | Many
projects (Ariadne’s
Thread, ASA 08 + our meeting) and especially some of the not approved
projects had experienced missing or very slow and late feed back
with information
to DfP-coordinator. A wellfunctioning network demands a continuosly communication from each organisation. |
||||||
| 7. | A procedure is needed on how
to find additional partners in case a project needs some after the DfP-meeting.
|
||||||
|
8. |
The
meeting had a long discussion on alcohol after the presentation of ”MOJN” exchange
in DK for which the Swedish group on forehand had agreed not to drink
any alcohol during the week.
- Important issue to talk more abou - Maybe offering non-alcohol youth-exchanges in same way as we are not focussing on specific age-groups (13-18 or 15-19 etc.) - More focus of the preparation of the group before the exchange
|
||||||
| To DfP-meeting Monday 24.11 | |||||||
| To DfP mainsite | 2009 Calender | ||||||